Recent Posts
Becky and I have read to our children since they were infants. We read so [more]
Galatians 3:27 states, “For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put [more]
Week 8: God Saves His People Weekly memory verse: Exodus 15:1 – “I will sing [more]
Kevin T. Bauder Genesis 1:28 is sometimes called the cultural mandate: “And God said unto [more]
For most of church history, singing songs of repentance was part of regular, weekly corporate [more]

William Ames on the connection between prayer, singing, and outward expressions

480px-DrAmesIn the second book of The Marrow of TheologyWilliam Ames’s (1576-1633) classic Post-Reformation work, Ames deals with a number of matters related to practical theology. The ninth chapter discusses prayer.1 As you will see, Ames’s approach to this topic is helpful from a historical and practical perspective.

Prayer, Ames says, can be outward or inward–mental or audible. Audible prayer, properly speaking, should always be the expression of inward prayer. He explains, “The voice is the human organ of articulate speech which is often necessary to expression, stir up, continue, and increase an inward affection of the mind.” Strictly speaking, the inward affection should come before the outward expression. Yet, as is so often the case, when the affection is spoken, the expression will often stir the affections up to an even greater extent.2 Moreover, God intended that the voice unify the soul and the body for religious exercises.

For Ames, the crucial role of the voice in expressing prayer demands that whoever prays does so with understanding. If one repeats or verbalizes words without thinking (or without the affection behind it), it is akin to the mimicry of a talking bird. Moreover, prayers should only be long or repeated if they arise from the “abundance of the heart.” Indeed, longer prayers under these circumstances “are most acceptable to God, as sufficiently appears in proved examples of such prayers in the Scriptures.”

Ames draws another implication from the connection of inward and outward prayers, namely that the words used in audible prayers should never “deflect due attention either from God, the subject matter, or the inward affection of the mind.” He continues, “In solemn audible prayers bodily attitudes are required which befit the majesty of God, our own baseness, and the matter at hand.”

READ
Limited Atonement: Evaluating the Argument

As is common with the Puritans, Ames regarded singing to be a form of prayer. You see, people pray audibly either in prose or in meter. Singing, of course, is metrical, and so the vocalization, by necessity, is much more controlled and deliberate. “The melody of singing is ordained for a certain kind of spiritual delight whereby the mind is held in meditation on the thing that is sung.” It is important to note here that Ames emphasizes the spiritual delight from singing that comes when the mind clearly understands the content of the song. For Ames, singing should aid in such meditation. Such a “lifting up of the heart to God” is the goal of sung prayers.

Because singing is prayer, Ames disapproves of using “the decalogue and the like” as the text for songs, for such passages of Scripture are not, properly speaking, prayers.3 We sing with “bodily attitudes” that are different from those we use in prayer because singing builds believers up and displays the “joy of the mind.” Ames disapproves of antiphonal singing because the voices are not all together; antiphonal singing does not as effectively lend itself to mutual edification and corporate affections.4 Moreover, Ames insists that “broken music which the mind cannot follow should be kept out of holy exercises, at least in those which we have with others” so that others understand our speech (here citing 1 Cor 14).

Ames’s teaching benefits us. His distinction between inward and outward prayer helps us see the importance of conscious prayer. The connection between singing and praying is a good one for us to remember, and not highlighted enough in our day. He reminds us of the organic connection between body and soul, and that the actions of the body, whether by words or other actions, should never detract from the content of the prayer.

READ
The Church Assembles for Worship, Part 3 by Ryan Martin

 

Ryan Martin

About Ryan Martin

Ryan Martin is pastor of the First Baptist Church of Granite Falls, Minnesota. Prior to that, he served as the associate pastor of Bethany Bible Church in Hendersonville, North Carolina. He is on the board of directors of Religious Affections Ministries. Ryan received his undergraduate degree at Northland Baptist Bible College, and has received further training from Central Baptist Theological Seminary of Minneapolis, Minn. (M.Div., 2004; Ph.D., 2013). He was ordained in 2009 at Bible Baptist Church of Elk River, Minn. (now Otsego, Minn.). He has a wife and children too.



Endnotes:

  1. All citations for this article come from William Ames, The Marrow of Theology, ed. John Dykstra Eusden (1968; repr., Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1997), 261-63. []
  2. Here Ames assumes that these are the prayers of regenerate people, whose affections are divinely wrought. []
  3. Although Ames allows for extra-Scriptural words in prose prayer, he does not seem to allow the same privilege to sung prayers, where he seems to restrict the texts of church music to the prayers of Scripture in metrical form. []
  4. Specifically, Ames rejects singing where the minister sings and the congregation responds with the same line. []

One Response to William Ames on the connection between prayer, singing, and outward expressions

Leave a reply