An Observation Today's Pastors Would Do Well To Hear

“A final general observation arising out of this period (The Second Great Awakening) has to do with the manner in which the unusual sense of the presence of God was recognized in the churches which experienced these revivals. It was not because men saw weeping multitudes, unrestrained noise and high excitement that they believed a revival had begun. On the contrary, such things — which are sometimes supposed to be of the essence of revival — were almost entirely absent in the Northeast during the greater part of the Second Great Awakening. . . . The presence of God and the measure of his working was not judged by such things but rather by the deep impression made on people by ‘the power of divine truth.’ Far from aiming at stirring excitement, the preachers sought to avoid it. ‘It was their object, indeed, to make deep impressions on the hearts of sinners,” observed Porter, “but to do this only be means of truth. Accordingly, the whole tendency of things was to produce exercises of the calm, solemn, pungent kind rather than passionate and clamorous excitement.’”
- Ian Murray, Revival and Revivalism, 137-138
There are many good pastors today, I have observed, who, while certainly aiming to “make deep impressions on the hearts of sinners” “by means of truth,” also find it necessary to “motivate” or “encourage” their people to have a “zeal” or “passion” for the truth.1
And then they wish their people would have a visible “excitement” for God, just like one might have at a sporting event.
Perhaps instead we should take note of the past, lest we fall into the grave errors that folllowed the era of the Second Great Awakening.
© 2009, Scott Aniol. All rights reserved.

Scott Aniol
Scott Aniol holds a bachelor's degree in church music from Bob Jones University (Greenville, SC), a master's degree in musicology from Northern Illinois University (DeKalb, IL), and has studied theology at Central Baptist Theological Seminary (Plymouth, MN) and Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary. He was ordained to to the gospel ministry by First Baptist Church (Rockford, IL) in April of 2004. As the executive director of Religious Affections Ministries, Scott speaks on the subjects of music and worship at various churches and conferences. His most recent speaking engagements include the Preserving the Truth Conference, Central Seminary’s Foundations Conference, International Baptist College, and Bob Jones Seminary. Click here to read and/or listen to important talks from Scott Aniol. Curriculum vitae
Endnotes:
- See, for instance, Bob Kauflin’s understanding of what a worship leader should be doing. [↩]
Related posts:
2 Responses to An Observation Today's Pastors Would Do Well To Hear
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Monthly eJournal
Twitter
- We must never favor novelty for novelty’s sake; we must not reject our tradition merely because it is tradition. http://t.co/zHthzaXQ 1 day ago
- The more evangelicals imitate worldly fads and values, the more irrelevant they become. http://t.co/tgdGYjXL 1 day ago
- Cultivating historic church worship tradition is the best kind of multicultural worship. 1 day ago
- @hardecker It went well. Thanks! 1 day ago
- The beauty of Jesus Christ http://t.co/7klhHgyn 2 days ago
Recent Blog Comments
Tags
affection art Articles on Culture Articles on Music Articles on Worship Audio beauty children choral Christ Christmas church music conservatism conservative contextualization Dan Forrest Driscoll emotion entertainment evangelism folk culture form Gospel hymns imagination Kevin Bauder meaning missional missions passion physical pop culture preaching Regulative Principle Resources reverence service shared Sola Scriptura Sound Worship support theology tradition tweets web pulse














Well stated. We have inherited too much from Finney that needs to be scrutinized and replaced. After nearly two hundred years, “excitement” and other physical evidences thought to manifest the Spirit’s work have become deeply ingrained in Evangliecal culture.
I’m right with you. I’m working my way (again) through Revival and Revivalism in preparation for a writing project, and I’m struck again with how much, not just Finney, but a Pelagian view of evangelism, has influenced modern fundamentalism and evangelicalism.