Recent Posts
The Church confesses the incarnation of Jesus Christ as a mystery. On the one hand [more]
You can't escape them. There are 12 Days of Christmas contests on the radio, 12 Days of [more]
In brief: whether a man be good, better, or best of all; bad, worse, or [more]
On the evening of December 7, 2014, the congregation of Fourth Baptist Church authorized its pastor, Matt [more]
In 1 Cor 9:22, Paul says, “I have become all things to all men that by all [more]

Reading recommendations on musical meaning

I received some good feeback from my post last week briefly explaining musical meaning. Several were on Twitter:

One question I received on Twitter was whether I would provide some reading recommendations on the topic of musical meaning:


Here are some sources if you are interested in pursuing this topic.

Of course, my two books both deal with the subject extensively:

Appendix C in John Makujina’s book does an excellent job dealing with it as well.

For musicologists’ and philosophers’ perspectives, I recommend the following books:

  • What to Listen for in Music by Aaron Copland
  • The Unanswered Question by Leonard Bernstein (originally a Harvard lecture; watch here)
  • Musical Meaning and Expression by Stephen Davies
  • Emotion and Meaning in Music by Leonard Meyer
  • Feeling and Form by Susan Langer
  • Introduction to a Philosophy of Music by Peter Kivy

Finally, I’ve dealt with the subject from various angles in some articles:

  • I deal with the issue in my series on Christian rap and in my debate with Shai Linne.
  • I presented this paper at BJU Seminary for several years.
  • In this article, “Musical Relativism in Pelagian,” I link to the lecture series given by Makujina at DBTS and then give an argument myself (which may be somewhat of a repeat of the argument in the Christian rap series). I’d recommend Makujina’s lecture series as well, of course.
  • Speaking of Makujina, he presented this paper at a regional ETS that deals with the issue from a similar perspective.
  • I presented this paper (audio) at the Preserving the Truth Conference a few years back, in which I deal with the issue tangentially.
  • This paper (audio) on form in hymnody deals with the issue of meaning in music.
  • I deal with the issue from a multiculturalism perspective in this article. That whole series is worth reading in this regard.

What else would you recommend? I’ll update the post with good suggestions.

Scott Aniol

About Scott Aniol

Scott Aniol is the founder and Executive Director of Religious Affections Ministries. He is on faculty at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, where he teaches courses in worship, hymnology, aesthetics, culture, and philosophy. He has written two books, dozens of articles, and speaks around the country in churches and conferences. He is an elder in his church in Fort Worth, TX where he resides with his wife and two children.

4 Responses to Reading recommendations on musical meaning

  1. Martin says:

    Maybe people will enjoy watching Bernstein explaining his ideas on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3HLqCHO08s
    This is long, in several parts, but very interesting to see. He explains the parallels he sees between music and poetry.

  2. Scott Aniol Scott Aniol says:

    Yes! Those are excellent. Thanks.

  3. Daniel Wilson says:

    Scott,
    Thanks for the book list! I’ve read parts of the Bernstein and Copeland before. Good stuff. The rest of those will find their way into my amazon shopping cart pretty soon.
    I’ve got a couple of tangent topics that would make for interesting articles if you’re looking to write more… :)

    1. Approaches to musical meaning: Do you start with philosophy and musicology to argue that music has meaning and then use scripture to determine how it is used? Or do you use scripture to argue both of those points? If so, then what is the use of ministers reading Kant and Schopenhauer?
    Surely each of these approaches has its pros and cons and these approaches aren’t mutually exclusive. How would you recommend building a foundation of knowledge on this topic?

    2. If music has meaning apart from lyrics, then how can churches better utilize absolute music into their services?
    As an absolute musician (my own term) what can I do to convince the clergy and congregation that a Bach concerto with no words can be for God’s glory?

    Daniel

  4. Scott Aniol Scott Aniol says:

    Hey, Daniel!

    I think the Bible implies that music apart from lyrics communicates, but the Bible is not a music textbook, so it does not prove that or explain how it works, certainly.

    So as with any other ethical matter not explicitly addressed in Scripture, I begin with seeking to understand the matter–in this case, music–philosophically and scientifically. Then I seek the Scriptures to determine what principles apply to that matter. In the case of music, I would say that anything in Scripture that addresses our communication applies to musical choices.

    As for reading the philosophers, I think there is value in that in understanding the development of thought in the matter, although I’m not sure it’s absolutely necessary to understand how music works or what scriptural principles apply.

    As for absolute music in worship. In the first place, I understand a pastor’s objection to music without lyrics. In today’s entertainment culture, it’s easy to slip into spectator mode when there’s no clearly “sacred” content to connect my thoughts to.

    However, since music by itself can express and teach the affections, I do believe that music by itself–even without a text–can have a place in the context of worship. I would say that a pastor (and the congregation) simple needs teaching to help them see that, and as a stepping stone, I might give them a passage of Scripture on which to meditate that complements the sentiments expressed in the absolute music to help them begin to recognize the value of music by itself.

    I hope that helps!

Leave a reply