While I affirm sola scriptura and privilege the authority of biblical revelation in our worship and music reflection, these convictions do not preclude us from gaining favorable insights from the history of the church, philosophy, a community of believers, the social sciences, and other sources where God’s truth about the world and the people who live in it may be discerned.

This statement is slightly adapted from one made by a leading evangelical leader about another issue. Can you guess who said it and in what context? No Googling!

© 2011, Scott Aniol. All rights reserved.

Scott Aniol

Scott Aniol holds a bachelor's degree in church music from Bob Jones University (Greenville, SC), a master's degree in musicology from Northern Illinois University (DeKalb, IL), and has studied theology at Central Baptist Theological Seminary (Plymouth, MN) and Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary. He was ordained to to the gospel ministry by First Baptist Church (Rockford, IL) in April of 2004. As the executive director of Religious Affections Ministries, Scott speaks on the subjects of music and worship at various churches and conferences. His most recent speaking engagements include the Preserving the Truth Conference, Central Seminary’s Foundations Conference, International Baptist College, and Bob Jones Seminary. Click here to read and/or listen to important talks from Scott Aniol. Curriculum vitae


Related posts:

  1. Web Pulse – March 25, 2010
  2. Web Pulse – March 13, 2010
  3. A Philosophy of Corporate Worship – Part 2 « spaces between the silence
  4. A Philosophy of Corporate Worship – Part 1 « spaces between the silence
  5. Dates Open for Worship/Music Church Meetings
Tagged with:
 
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

7 Responses to We need church history, philosophy, etc. when making decisions about our worship

  1. David Oestreich says:

    John MacArthur re: beverage alcohol.

  2. Scott Aniol says:

    Nope, but good guess. That was a good article yesterday.

  3. ben says:

    To say, “We need church history, philosophy, etc.” is not at all the same as to say that we are not precluded “from gaining favorable insights from the history of the church, philosophy,” etc.

    That said, this is a statement that any number of people could have made on any number of topics: Mohler on sexual ethics, MacDonald on why congregationalism is from the devil, Wells on contextualization, Keller on social justice, Waltke on the non-historicity of Adam and Eve, Driscoll on why churches need multiple sites, and almost (but not quite) Dever on why they don’t.

  4. Scott Aniol says:

    Your point is valid.

  5. David Oestreich says:

    I almost guessed Dever on polity.

  6. Scott Aniol says:

    Nope, nope, and nope, but getting close.

  7. Scott Aniol says:

    FYI, it was Ed Stetzer talking about missiology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>