Recent Posts
A bishop has to meet stringent personal qualifications, the broadest of which is that he [more]
Last week I discussed how the Praise and Worship movement has blurred important doctrinal distinctives [more]
Jeff Straub Ecclesiastes 3:4 reminds us that there is a “time to weep.” If [more]
We now have one hundred hymns available for free download on our online hymnal. These [more]
Perhaps Tozer used more ink on the topic of worship than on any other. As [more]

Distorting the building blocks of worship

This entry is part 2 of 5 in the series

"The Building Blocks of Worship"

You can read more posts from the series by using the Table of Contents in the right sidebar.

Last week I suggested that the basic building blocks of worship worship established in the creation/fall events: (1) God reveals himself and initiates a relationship with his people; (2) God forms the boundaries of the relationship with his commandments; (3) the nature of worship consists in this relationship of communion between man and his Creator; (4) this worship takes place in the sanctuary of God’s presence; (5) failure to obey the commandments of God prohibits communion with him; (6) God provides atonement whereby man is once again enabled to walk in communion with him.

Before showing how these building blocks continue to be developed by God’s people, I’d like to make a tangential point I think worth considering.

The presence of these essential elements of worship in creation account not only for their persistence in the Judeo-Christian worship practice, but also in the practices of pagan worship as well.

Many have noted that the worship practices of Israel share elements in common with nations around them including a sacrificial system, a sanctuary, priests, etc., leading secular scholars to conclude that the worship practices of ancient Israel arose as mere evolutionary developments from other Near Eastern religions.1

Even some evangelicals, however, suggest that these similarities reveal that when God instituted worship forms for Israel, he “contextualized” worship in cultural forms and practices they would understand. For example, Andrew Hill argues that the institution of sacrifices “demonstrates God’s wiliness to accommodate his revelation to cultural conventions. Human sacrifice was practiced in ancient Mesopotamia, and Abraham was no doubt familiar with the ritual since he came from Ur of the Chaldees (Gen 11:31).”2

However, recognizing that these elements were instituted by God at Creation provides an alternative explanation for the similarities: ideas of sanctuary, atonement, priests, etc. were in the consciousness and traditions of all descendants of Adam. Furthermore, the differences between the worship of Israel and other nations far outweigh their similarities. For a classic argument along these lines, see George Ernest Wright, The Old Testament Against Its Environment (London: SCM Press, 1962). For a more recent treatment, including a survey of changes in scholarship, see John N. Oswalt, The Bible Among the Myths: Unique Revelation or Just Ancient Literature? (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009).

Next time, we’ll see how these elements were developed legitimately by God’s people.

Series NavigationPreviousNext
Scott Aniol

About Scott Aniol

Scott Aniol is the founder and Executive Director of Religious Affections Ministries. He is on faculty at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, where he teaches courses in ministry, worship, hymnology, aesthetics, culture, and philosophy. He has written several books, dozens of articles, and speaks around the country in churches and conferences. He is an elder in his church in Fort Worth, TX where he resides with his wife and two children.


  1. See, for example, Mark S. Smith, The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel’s Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts: Israel’s Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003). []
  2. Andrew Hill, Enter His Courts with Praise: Old Testament Worship for the New Testament Church (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996), 33. []

Leave a reply