Sola Scriptura and Form: Introduction
This entry is part of 4 in the series
"Sola Scriptura and Form"

Dr. Matt Olson, president of Northland International University, opened a recent sermon on music thus:
“What about the music? You know, it’s interesting, as we dive into this discussion: I don’t find one verse in the entire New Testament that addresses the style of music, and that’s usually where our controversy is.”
I highlight Dr. Olson’s sermon, not because the aforecited quotation is in any way original, but because it’s a recent and prominent restatement of a common objection to musical conservatism. The point of this claim (I speak here generally, and not of Dr. Olson’s specific motivation) is as follows: if the Bible does not address musical style, claims about the superiority or inferiority of differing styles of music are merely expressions of preference; it follows that such claims must be moved out of the realm of oughts and shoulds, at least in any strong sense of those terms.
What should we make of this argument? First, I’m quite willing to concede the specific claim: the Bible (and, more particularly, the NT) does not offer us anything like explicit musical instruction for the church. But I’m not convinced that this silence underwrites the conclusion that is said to follow.
The thesis of this series of posts is that because the Bible is itself expressed in certain forms, and because the Bible is our final authority for faith and practice, we have an obligation to mirror biblical forms in our own expression of biblical truth. In other words, the Bible not only has content (a what), but it also has a manner (a how) of expressing that content. The Bible’s how is as authoritative for us as its what. If this is true, we must develop a hermeneutic that takes form into account, and we must develop a homiletic and a broader philosophy of worship that attempts to present the biblical what in a form that communicates to a modern audience in the same manner as the biblical form.
In my next post, I will explain why our focus on biblical content has left us largely oblivious to biblical forms.
© 2010, Michael Riley. All rights reserved.

Michael Riley
Michael Riley is a PhD Student in Apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary. He is the Assistant to the President at Central Baptist Theological Seminary of Minneapolis. Michael blogs at www.mpriley.com.
Related posts:
2 Responses to Sola Scriptura and Form: Introduction
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Monthly eJournal
Twitter
- Fashion advice for pastors? http://t.co/hTw2WzBu 8 hours ago
- Good thoughts for Ascension Day. http://t.co/Th0NgMUZ 9 hours ago
- I despise shopping for clothes. 1 week ago
Recent Blog Comments
- Dana Miles on Help Needed: Toward A Discography of Conservative Christian Music
- David Jacks on The Separatist Approach to Culture
- Pastor Johaness Dingome Biyick ben Israel on The Judeo-Christian Worship Tradition
- David on Conclusion
- More Chairs at the Theological Table: Reflections on Timothy Tennent’s “Theology in the Context of World Christianity” | Helwys Society Forum on Should western music be transplanted to missions church plants?
Tags
affection art Articles on Culture Articles on Music Articles on Worship Audio beauty children choral Christ Christmas church music conservatism conservative contextualization Dan Forrest Driscoll emotion entertainment evangelism folk culture form Gospel hymns imagination Kevin Bauder meaning missional missions passion physical pop culture preaching Regulative Principle Resources reverence service shared Sola Scriptura Sound Worship support theology tradition tweets web pulse














Michael, I really appreciated your series on a Biblical basis of conservatism. Looking forward to this one as well, particularly the extent to which you believe the how is prescriptive/regulative (whichever the best word would be).
Rats. Make that theological basis.