Kevin DeYoung (DeYoung, Restless, and Reformed) has a good post today asking pastors and church leaders not to assume that the decline they see in their church is because of (or can be solved by) worship styles. He says,
I do wish church leaders would stop assuming that their problems boil down to a certain worship style and can be fixed with another. I run into church leaders fairly often who struggle to make sense of their declining numbers. I feel for these brothers (and sometimes they are sisters in my circles). I don’t know all the reasons for church growth or church decline. Growth does not equal faithfulness any more than decline equals failure. Sometimes situations, histories, and circumstances are outside our control. Regenerating human hearts always is. So we should be slow to judge another church’s fruitfulness.
And yet, we can ask better questions. I’m not against changing worship styles. There may be good reasons to do so in some circumstances. But I doubt very much that’s usually the real problem. Instead of assuming that young people will flock to our churches if we drop the organ and plug in the guitar (and we have both at our church), declining denominations and shrinking churches should ask deeper, harder questions . . .
We agree with DeYoung’s principle points. He continues by listing several good questions churches should be asking themselves (many of which questions should be asked, it would seem, whether or not the church is declining in numbers).
Indeed, numbers do not a faithful ministry make. The idea that God’s blessing is proportionately tied to the number of lumps of flesh filling our new theater-style seats is wholly antithetical to the Biblical testimony. With few exceptions, we see the people of God as relatively few in number, and often shunned by the world. Indeed, we should expect to see further decline among faithful churches in the United States as our Christian and Puritan heritage further dims out of sight in the rear view mirror, though we would love for things to end up differently.
But returning to Pastor DeYoung’s main thesis, “changing the worship style” is more often than not a Band-aid covering up, rather than properly healing, a deadly cancer. And, ironically enough, it is usually the people who insist that “worship styles don’t matter” who are quickest to think that changing a said style to a more contemporary one is absolutely necessary to the vitality of the church. This is an error from the pit of hell. Given normal circumstances, no surface change can result in the true grace of God flourishing among his people (not to speak of the unregenerate). God does not work like that; he is not bound by such mechanisms. Instead, he promises in His sovereign goodness to bless the preaching of the Word with his Spirit to convert the ungodly (Mark 4:24; John 5:24; 8:47; Rom 10:17; Acts 26:16-18; Gal 3:2; Eph 1:13; cf. Psa 19:7). And He holds out to us who are believers the grace of Christ, and blesses our receiving this grace by faith through the normal, mundane (though glorious) activities of the body of Christ: sound preaching, Scripture reading, earnest prayer, sincere hymns and singing, true Christian fellowship, generous giving, and loving admonishment and discipline. Over and over again God in his Word blesses these activities as the ones of true spiritual benefit (e.g., Luke 24:32; John 10:4; 17:17; Acts 20:31; 1 Cor 14:3, 24-25; 2 Cor 2:14; Eph 4:11-16, 29-30; 5:15-20; 6:18; Phil 4:10-20; Col 3:15-16; 1 Thess 2:13; 5:12; 1 Tim 4:11-16; 2 Tim 3:16; 4:2; James 1:21-25; Rev 1:3).
All of this points to the fact that God never suggests to us that the key to our ministry is our cultural contemporaneity. When we think that we can solve the problem simply by changing how we say things, we are on the wrong track. This is not how God has revealed himself to work. Instead, we ought to first look at how faithful we are being to the pattern of gospel ministry he has given us by his apostles in the New Testament. Then, we ought to consider if in fact the numerical decline is really the problem it seems to be. It may be that, for a period, God has for us a time of sorrowful sowing with tears. In the words of Kent and Barbara Hughes:
“. . . the life of Moses teaches us that one can be regarded as hugely successful in the ministry and yet be a failure. It is possible to give people exactly what they need–the practical exposition of God’s Word, inspiring worship, programs that wonderfully meet human needs–and yet be a failure. It is possible to be held up as a paragon of success and to receive the ardent accolades of one’s people and be a failure.” (Liberating Ministry from the Success Syndrome, 36).
So with Kevin we say, let’s not rush to capitulate on our style of worship. Let’s not resort to surface remedies and this strange evangelical panacea for all ministry troubles. The grace of Christ works without surface changes. There may be times when we need to change slightly the way in which we articulate the gospel, but this will be the exception, not the rule. Instead, let us turn again to the things God has wonderfully blessed in his word and trust in Him who is able to change supernaturally the souls of men through the preaching of the gospel and true Spiritual ministry.