Proponents of definite atonement wish to avoid a “hypothetical” atonement by asserting that the elect’s sins were actually atoned for, when Christ died in A. D. 33. This has the unintended logical consequence of eternal justification: the hyper-Calvinist notion that the elect were justified before their birth. To avoid this logical consequence, proponents of particular… Continue Reading
![Limited Atonement: Provision and Application](https://i0.wp.com/religiousaffections.org/wp-content/uploads/RAMiTunes.jpg?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1#aqua_resizer_image_not_local)