Recent Posts
Matt Shrader Debates over theological education are nothing new. Why do we have seminary theological [more]
Last week I highlighted the fact that the Enlightenment essentially created a Worldview without God, [more]
De gustibus non est disputandum, said the ancient Romans. There is no disputing over taste, [more]
In Acts 15:1–35, the Jerusalem Council concluded that requiring Gentile believers to be circumcised and [more]
Kevin T. Bauder Abraham entered the Promised Land as a foreigner. Although he spent virtually [more]

A good and bad way to use Lent

It’s that time of year again, a time when Evangelical Christians debate whether or not it is a good thing to observe Lent. My answer to that question is always the same: it depends on what you mean by “Lent” and “observe.”

Here is a short note I have sent our congregation on occasion to explain how we do and don’t use Lent (and the Church Year in general) in our church:

There are two ways a church can use the Church Year: as a helpful tool or as a legalistic burden. At our church, we use the Church Year (Advent, Christmas, Epiphany, Lent, Palm Sunday, Holy Week, Easter, Ascension Day, and Pentecost) as a tool that guides our Scripture readings and hymns, directing our attention to the coming, life, sufferings, death, resurrection, and ascension of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Some church traditions, however, require the observance of certain practices during Lent like penitence, fasting, putting ash on one’s head, abstaining from meat, etc., some even believing that such practices earn us merit and favor with God.

At our church, we have two thoughts about this: First, we firmly believe that Christ sufficiently suffered on our behalf, and therefore those who believe in him need not “participate” in his suffering in any way, especially not in an attempt to earn favor with God. We are fully favored by God in Christ! So we want to deliberately avoid any notion of Lent that creates theological confusion.

Second, we believe that if individual Christians wish to fast or observe some of these other practices as spiritual disciplines, they certainly have biblical freedom to do so. But Jesus also clearly commanded that when we fast, we should do so in secret (Matt 6:16-18), and as a church we certainly may not make any of these practices a spiritual requirement (Romans 14:1-12).

So we will use the next six Sundays as a tool to remember various occasions in the life of Christ that led him to suffer for us on the cross. We do so, not to participate in his suffering or earn merit with God, but remembering that Jesus cried “It is finished,” having accomplished all the suffering necessary for our redemption!

If you are interested, here are a couple good articles that present the historic Reformed understanding of Lent:

Lent and the Regulative Principle of Worship

Repent of Lent: How Spiritual Disciplines Can Be Bad for Your Soul

Liturgy is cool

Scott Aniol

About Scott Aniol

Scott Aniol is the founder and Executive Director of Religious Affections Ministries. He is Chair of the Worship Ministry Department at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, where he teaches courses in ministry, worship, hymnology, aesthetics, culture, and philosophy. He is the author of Worship in Song: A Biblical Approach to Music and Worship, Sound Worship: A Guide to Making Musical Choices in a Noisy World, and By the Waters of Babylon: Worship in a Post-Christian Culture, and speaks around the country in churches and conferences. He is an elder in his church in Fort Worth, TX where he resides with his wife and four children. Views posted here are his own and not necessarily those of his employer.

Leave a reply